Netvora logo
Submit Startup Subscribe
Home About Contact Submit Startup Subscribe

How much information do LLMs really memorize? Now we know, thanks to Meta, Google, Nvidia and Cornell

Comment

How much information do LLMs really memorize? Now we know, thanks to Meta, Google, Nvidia and Cornell

How much information do LLMs really memorize? Now we know, thanks to Meta, Google, Nvidia and Cornell

Unlocking the Secrets of Large Language Models: How They Learn and Why

By Netvora Tech News


Most people interested in generative AI are likely familiar with Large Language Models (LLMs) like those behind ChatGPT, Anthropic's Claude, and Google's Gemini. These models are trained on massive datasets, comprising trillions of words pulled from websites, books, codebases, and increasingly, other media such as images, audio, and video. But why? The answer lies in the way LLMs develop a statistical, generalized understanding of language, its patterns, and the world. This understanding is encoded in the form of billions of parameters, or "settings," in a network of artificial neurons (mathematical functions that transform input data into output signals). By being exposed to all this training data, LLMs learn to detect and generalize patterns that are reflected in the parameters of their neurons. For instance, the word "apple" often appears near terms related to food, fruit, or trees, and sometimes computers. The model picks up that apples can be red, green, or yellow, or even sometimes other colors if rotten or rare, are spelled "a-p-p-l-e" in English, and are edible. This statistical knowledge influences how the model responds when a user enters a prompt, shaping the output it generates based on the associations it "learned" from the training data. However, a big question remains: how much of an LLM's training data is used to build generalized representations of concepts, and how much is instead memorized verbatim or stored in a way that is identical or nearly identical to the original data? Surprisingly, more training data does not lead to more memorization — in fact, a model will be less likely to memorize any single data point. To identify these findings, researchers used a combination of techniques, including analyzing the model's behavior and measuring its performance on various tasks. They found that as the model is trained on more data, it becomes more adept at generalizing patterns and less likely to memorize specific instances. This has significant implications for the development of LLMs and their potential applications. By understanding how these models learn and what they retain, researchers can optimize their design and training to achieve more accurate and informative outcomes.
  • LLMs develop a statistical, generalized understanding of language and the world through massive datasets.
  • Training data influences how the model responds to prompts and shapes its output.
  • More training data does not lead to more memorization, but rather improves generalization capabilities.

Comments (0)

Leave a comment

Back to homepage